Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Listed here’s a brief overview:
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined via the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of in the future in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged occurrence along with the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to be the real brothers in the deceased but they did not react in the least to the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak form of evidence which can be manoeuvred by the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on a motorcycle at 4.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Use the PACER Case Locator if You're not absolutely sure which specific federal court the case was filed. You may additionally conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in the federal case. This database updates at midnight every day.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale behind their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that whilst considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to consider the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of qualified candidates who are found for being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of the respondent department.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge mainly because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out from the counsel for the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
after release from the jail website he lost interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
This case continues to be cited in various subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, plus the rule of regulation.
Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (3), is setting a precedent which allows for much easier access into the public to strategy the superior courts and also the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
Looking for your price of a Kenwood hand mixer in Pakistan? Check out this resource: kenwood hand mixer price in pakistan.
Look for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Verify the information against other sources when achievable.
competent authority has determined the eligibility in the private respondents and found them to get match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)